Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 42: 217-220, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-956853

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize injuries caused by exercise resistance bands. METHOD: Single-site retrospective case series of patients presenting to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute emergency room with ocular injuries secondary to exercise resistance bands from March through September 2020. RESULTS: Eleven patients (9 males, 2 females, 14 eyes) were reviewed. Eight patients had a unilateral injury (3 right eyes, 5 left eyes) while 3 had bilateral injuries. Iritis was the most common presentation, seen in all 11 patients, followed by hyphema (9 patients, 82%), and vitreous hemorrhage (4 patients, 36%). Among affected eyes, the mean presenting visual acuity was approximately 20/100, improving to 20/40 on the last follow up (p = 0.06). However, 4 eyes (33%) had vision ≤20/60 at last follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise resistance bands can cause a wide spectrum of ocular injuries, some leading to long-term vision loss. As such, we recommend that patients strongly consider using eye protection goggles or glasses while using resistance bands for exercise.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Eye Injuries/diagnosis , Eye Injuries/etiology , Resistance Training/adverse effects , Resistance Training/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital , Eye Injuries/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 29(1): 76-80, 2021 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-936238

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report photokeratitis caused by the improper use of germicidal lamps purchased during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Case series. RESULTS: Seven patients presented with acute ocular surface pain after exposure to UV-emitting germicidal lamps. Visual acuity was 20/30 or better in 13 of 14 eyes (93%). Anterior segment examination revealed varying degrees of conjunctival injection and diffusely distributed punctate epithelial erosions (PEEs) in every patient. No intraocular inflammation was identified across the cohort and all fundus examinations were normal. Treatment varied by provider and included artificial tears alone or in combination with antibiotic ointments and/or topical steroids. Five patients were followed via telehealth, one patient returned for an in-office visit, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Five of six patients endorsed complete resolution of symptoms within 2-3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should follow manufacturer recommendations when using UV-emitting germicidal lamps and avoid direct exposure to the ocular surface.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cornea/pathology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Eye Burns/complications , Keratitis/etiology , Pandemics , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Adult , COVID-19/transmission , Cornea/radiation effects , Eye Burns/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Keratitis/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Slit Lamp Microscopy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL